PPAP Compliance Verification

Analyze compliance across all 18 PPAP elements with AI-powered insights

75%
Overall Compliance
12
Compliant
3
Partial
3
Non-Compliant

PPAP Elements Visualization

PPAP123456789101112131415161718Compliance StatusCompliantPartially CompliantNon-Compliant
PPAP ElementStatusDocumentIssuesActions
1. Design RecordsCompliantDrawing_123456_Rev_C.pdfNone
2. Engineering Change DocumentationCompliantECO_78952_Rev_B.pdfNone
3. Customer Engineering ApprovalCompliantCustomer_Approval_Form.pdfNone
4. DFMEAPartialDFMEA_123456_Rev_A.xlsxMissing risk assessment for secondary features
5. Process Flow DiagramCompliantProcess_Flow_123456.pdfNone
6. PFMEANon-CompliantPFMEA_123456_Rev_B.xlsxSeverity ratings inconsistent with Control Plan; Missing critical characteristics
7. Control PlanPartialControl_Plan_123456_Rev_A.xlsxInspection methods inconsistent with PFMEA
8. MSA StudiesCompliantGRR_Studies_123456.pdfNone
9. Dimensional ResultsCompliantDimensional_Report_123456.xlsxNone
10. Material / Performance Test ResultsNon-CompliantTest_Results_123456.pdfMaterial specs don't match drawing requirements; Missing tests for surface hardness
11. Initial Process StudiesNon-CompliantProcess_Capability_123456.xlsxCpk values below 1.67 for critical characteristics; Missing SPC data
12. Qualified Laboratory DocumentationCompliantLab_Certifications.pdfNone
13. Appearance Approval ReportCompliantAAI_Report_123456.pdfNone
14. Sample Production PartsPartialSample_Submission_Form.pdfQuantity of samples submitted doesn't match requirement
15. Master SampleCompliantMaster_Sample_Record.pdfNone
16. Checking AidsCompliantChecking_Aids_123456.pdfNone
17. Records of ComplianceCompliantCompliance_Records_123456.pdfNone
18. Part Submission WarrantCompliantPSW_123456_Rev_A.pdfNone

Critical Path Analysis

Drawing
PFMEA
Control Plan
Process Capability

Cross-Reference Issues

Critical Characteristic Mismatch
Critical characteristics from the drawing (hole diameter ⌀10±0.02mm) is not properly referenced in the PFMEA.
Process Step Numbering Inconsistency
Process step numbers in Flow Diagram do not match with PFMEA and Control Plan.
Missing SPC Data
Control Plan specifies SPC monitoring for surface finish, but no capability data is provided.

AI-Generated Compliance Insights

Process Capability Improvement

The process capability studies show insufficient Cpk values (1.32) for the critical characteristic "shaft diameter" against the requirement of ≥1.67.

Actions:
  • Review and optimize the machining process parameters
  • Conduct additional capability studies with larger sample size
PFMEA Risk Assessment

The PFMEA has inconsistent severity ratings for failure modes related to critical characteristics. Customer safety requirements mandate severity ratings of 9-10 for all critical characteristics.

Actions:
  • Review all critical characteristics in the drawing
  • Update PFMEA severity ratings to align with customer requirements

Compliance Action Plan

Prioritized list of actions required to achieve full PPAP compliance

PriorityAction ItemOwnerStatusDue Date
HighUpdate PFMEA with correct severity ratings and detection controls for all critical characteristicsJ. SmithIn Progress2025-03-20
HighConduct process capability studies for critical characteristics with minimum sample size n=50R. JohnsonNot Started2025-03-22
HighVerify material specification and conduct proper material testingT. WilliamsNot Started2025-03-21
MediumAlign process step numbering between Process Flow, PFMEA, and Control PlanJ. SmithNot Started2025-03-24
MediumUpdate Control Plan inspection methods to match PFMEA controlsJ. SmithNot Started2025-03-25
LowSubmit additional sample parts to meet quantity requirementsM. DavisCompleted2025-03-18